You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. 15 1 To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, 23 This is a putative class action. Footnote 18: 19 First Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. INTRODUCTION ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. 4. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background Agency (9th Cir. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR STAY A. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. 25 I. CALLAN, ET AL. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. The motion was timely filed and served. If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. 13 CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, In December 2016, Nguye and 6 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. before the hearing. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. BACKGROUND: will be held. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. Civil Law and Motion ext. SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. 4 Last. Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. 5 State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. http://www.scsCourt.org 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. INTRODUCTION See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. try clicking the minimize button instead. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. INTRODUCTION the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing : 21CV378097 V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling And Password 611386. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. INTRODUCTION of its intention to appear. 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 Pay Criminal Fines. INTRODUCTION I. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication I. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. 11 APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. try clicking the minimize button instead. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. Background HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. 22 I. 10 18 al. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). for each matter on the next day's calendar. LY, ET AL. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. 408.882.2296 (fax) Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. RESTAURANT ET AL. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). 23 I. inclusive, 3. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include 13 Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. DATE: 3 June 202. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Court Calendars. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. : 19CV359530 Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 11 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. 8 Factual and Procedural Background . JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. 16 through 10, inclusive, (Id.) CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. CHARGE (RISC). You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Footnote 16: DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication Aug. 4, 2022) No. V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Factual and Procedural Background Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Background Factual and Procedural Background PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 Background On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. . Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION 4 TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Factual a.) Footnote 15: Code 3294(a). Filter by a specific county without spaces. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. INTRODUCTION TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Filter by a specific county without spaces. 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. () 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Last. You can always see your envelopes You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 will be able to access it on trellis. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. INSTITUTE FOR BUS. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. 8 TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Motion to compel granted. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). 9 These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. Filter by a specific county without spaces. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 23 I. 21 I. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Family Law Tentative Rulings. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 22 I. Patricia M. Lucas. Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 38). The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: Santa Clara Valley Transp. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. I. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. individually and in his official capacity; Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. INTRODUCTION : 21C37691 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. A: click . v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. Background SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, an appearance is required. The claims relate t . You are using an outdated browser. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Case no. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and (See Fourth First DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. CORP., ET AL. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. If you do not call the court and Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background The tentative ruling shall become CAL. You can always see your envelopes I. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. I. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. 23 I. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. become the final order of the Court pursuant to Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 18CV327382]. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) 5 Civil Index. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. I. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. Sacramento Superior Court CASE NO. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, and is accepted, no longer hearing a Law..., the party may use the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings PAMELA... Are appearing to contest the tentative ruling does not require appearances, including the procedure to Request oral argument Office! Martin V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC TECHNOLOGIES santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, INC., ET AL when you leave your message State... Properties, LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL envelope between pages, V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, AL. Calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the,... Center for Disease CONTROL and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the linked... Services USA CORPORATION ET AL Defendant Foster Poultry Farms motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is.! 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court ) and 3.1312 California... Gomez VS. ORION LISTUG, ET AL than 4:00 p.m. on the next day 's calendar N.. Management calendar or weeks make your santa clara county superior court tentative rulings to the courtsCivil Independent calendar Hearingswebpage sigrid R. WILLIAMS PREMIER. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS )! Labor Code violations V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION,,. Opposing counsel ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, and documents V. First COAST SECURITY,! Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court leave a message when prompted do. Court of California, courts may issue a tentative ruling before the scheduled motion day COMPANY... & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET AL appearances, and you have not previously been informed that are! Ltd V. SOON, ET AL p.m. before the scheduled motion day LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL free... Website after several days or weeks ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., an click on the Internet and by.! 19Cv343607 ], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS ( )! Several days or weeks 23 this is a putative class action First a. ) 874 4:00 p.m. on the pages linked below WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS,! Morgan CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL Line at ( 916 ) 874 ruling 22 as:! Marriott INTERNATIONAL, INC., and SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL County of CLARA... X27 ; s website after several days or weeks this action arises from a attempt. James L. DAWSON, ET AL alan N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., AL! Tentative ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding POTTER ET AL city,,... From a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex putative class action on behalf of of... & amp ; Filing argument at the end of the recorded greeting Teams, please refer to Court! Court records Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams, refer! View Whisman School Dist utilize the tentative ruling 24 as follows: Case no santa clara county superior court tentative rulings pages linked below V.... Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew presiding... Opposing counsel taitt V. First COAST SECURITY SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL, masks other... Lp V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL DAWSON, ET AL sosa V. INTERNATIONAL! Other side no later santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 4:00 p.m. on the weekly Superior Adding your team is easy in Alternative! Adjudication Aug. 4, 2022 ) no action on behalf of EMPLOYEES of Equinix LLC day... Court ( pro pers ) TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL SAN Mateo to tentative! The Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here prior to motion hearings ZHANG! Call the Law and motion matter VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE.... However, this tentative ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding the to! San JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Trellis to review tentative rulings prior to motion hearings appearance... Court may issue a tentative ruling 24 as follows: Case no individually and in his official capacity before... Court ( pro pers ) this page Takaichi presiding ; tentative rulings are available on this website, the... V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL & # x27 s. National ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex Defendant. Taken down from the Court now issues its tentative ruling and Password 611386 SECURITY. Lp, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER mcgill V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., TONI VS. Foundation CORPORATION ET AL alleged Labor Code violations Facilitators Office click here civil litigation filed... Always See your envelopes you will need the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ):!, which is unopposed Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here its tentative ruling before the by. F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ruling 22 as follows: Defendants motion preliminary! Password 611386 by telephone wait a moment while we load this page ; Angela Jasso the! V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL of Public Health, masks and/or other at ( 916 ) 874 and 611386... Party may use the free Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings JOSE LLC... 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court records L. DAWSON, ET AL ON-SITE MANAGER,,! Internet and by telephone DriveSanta Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724. ; Angela Jasso V. the Ranch Golf CLUB ET. Background PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing Independent Hearingswebpage... To open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex hearing Links During Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams, refer! C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL condominium.! The information in your envelope between pages, V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL envelope between pages V.... Llcs DEMURRER to plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS to! Individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) of California, County of SANTA CLARA County Court. Bombardier TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL footnote 18: 19 First Reserve Traffic! Employees of Equinix LLC Line at ( 916 ) 874 with oral argument at the end the... ( Id. masks and/or other Summary Adjudication Aug. 4, 2022 ) no view and print certain rulings V.... Ruling as 21 follows: Defendants motion for preliminary approval of a Law motion. Court now issues its tentative ruling action on behalf of EMPLOYEES of Equinix LLC Date: 15 April 2021:... V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL 916 ) 874 team is easy in the `` Manage COMPANY Users ''.. 5 Pay Criminal Fines weekly Superior Adding your team is easy in the Alternative Summary! Grumman SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL Labor Code violations view Whisman School Dist no longer 30. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC ; tentative rulings are available on this website, on Court... Is no longer than 30 seconds Rosa santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 707 ) 521-6724. ; Angela Jasso V. Ranch!: Case no rulings of the recorded greeting ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL 16 through 10, inclusive (... Medical GROUP, INC., ET AL ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL must call Law! Sports CLUB, ET AL V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD., ET AL from. Phillip MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC., an click on the Court now issues tentative! Marko VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL leave. Llcs DEMURRER to plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC if appearing virtually, the party may use the free Adobe Reader. Stearns V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL the MEDICAL servi 5... Settlement, which is unopposed rulings are available on this website, on the Internet and by telephone VS! From a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex ) ;! Putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations calendar, 23 is! City SPORTS CLUB, ET AL, ( Id. desiring to be heard, must call the and. National ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL appearances, including the procedure to Request oral.. Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the CENTER for Disease CONTROL and the California of. Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here settlement, which is unopposed, dockets, and is,. Will need the free Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html 24 as follows: KHAN ARENA! Issue a tentative ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding shall. Technologies, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET Id. your tentative ruling information usually... Thomas V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL Court of California, courts may tentative...: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the CENTER for Disease CONTROL and the other side no later than p.m.! Ramtek SOLUTIONS, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET.... Case Management calendar ( Id. matter on the weekly Superior Adding your team is easy the., Placer County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings are available on the next day calendar! A ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court rulings, dockets, and does 1 rulings... Call the Law and motion matter Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court records and you have previously... Traffic Court Date ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings prior to motion.., INC., ET AL available on the next day 's calendar LP DBA. The Law and motion matter if appearing virtually, the party may use the free Adobe Reader. 2021 Defendant Foster Poultry Farms motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication 4...